public class Threads 1 { intx=0; public class Runner implements Runnable { public void run() { int current = 0; for(int=i=0;i<4;i++){ current = x; System.out.print(current + “, “); x = current + 2; } } } public static void main(String[] args) { new Threads1().go(); } public void go() { Runnable r1 = new Runner(); new Thread(r1).start(); new Thread(r1 ).start(); } } Which two are possible results?()
foo and bar are public references available to many other threads. foo refers to a Thread and bar is an Object. The thread foo is currently executing bar.wait(). From another thread, which statement is the most reliable way to ensue that foo will stop executing wait()?
Which of the following commands should be used to monitor the number of threads on the scheduler’s run queue for any given interval?()
Your application uses two threads, named threadOne and threadTwo. You need to modify the code to prevent the execution of threadOne until threadTwo completes execution. What should you do?()
Your application uses two threads, named threadOne and threadTwo.You need to modify the code to prevent the execution of threadOne until threadTwo completes execution. What should you do?()
A customer needs to ensure that the number of threads servicing an application does not exceed the number of database connections available to the application. What step must you take to address this situation?()
The end of the joint with the exterior threads is called the().
Each fire hose coupling on a ship must have threads that meet the specifications of the().
Given: foo and bar are public references available to many other threads. foo refers to a Thread and bar is anObject. The thread foo is currently executing bar.wait(). From another thread,what provides the most reliable wayto ensure that foo will stop executing wait()?
Given: foo and bar are public references available to many other threads, foo refers to a Thread and bar is an Object. The thread foo is currently executing bar.wait(). From another thread, what provides the most reliable way to ensure that foo will stop executing wait()?()